Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

3±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ¼³À§Ä¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A STUDY ON THE TONGUE POSTURE IN CHILDREN WITH CLASS ¥² MALOCCLUSION

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1996³â 23±Ç 1È£ p.24 ~ 34
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾ç±ÔÈ£/Kyu Ho Yang

Abstract

°á·Ð
º» ¿¬±¸´Â Á¤»ó±³ÇÕ°ú ¥²±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ¿¡¼­ Çô ¹× ¼³°ñÀÇ À§Ä¡¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ°í, Çô ¹× ¼³°ñÀÇ
À§Ä¡¿Í ¾È¸é°ñ°Ý ÇüÅ¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ±¸¸íÇÏ°íÀÚ Àü³²´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°ú¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ È¯ÀÚµé°ú
±¤ÁÖÁö¿ª ±¹¹ÎÇлýÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Àü½ÅÁúȯÀÌ ¾ø°í ¹ßÀ°»óÅ°¡ ¾çÈ£Çϸç, º¸Ã¶Ä¡·á¿Í ±³Á¤Ä¡·á
ÀÇ °æÇèÀÌ ¾ø´Â ¸¸ 9¼¼¿¡¼­ 12¼¼ »çÀÌÀÇ Á¤»ó±³ÇÕÀÚ 18¸í, ¥²±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÚ 20¸í, ÃÑ 38¸íÀ»
¿¬±¸´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¾È¸é°ñ°Ý ÇüÅÂ¿Í Çô ¹× ¼³°ñÀÇ À§Ä¡¸¦ Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ ±³ÇÕÁß½ÉÀ§¿Í
¾ÈÁ¤À§½Ã¿¡¼­ Ãø¸ð µÎºÎ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁøÀ» ÃÔ¿µÇÏ¿© Á¤»ó±³ÇÕÀÚ¿Í ¥²±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÚ¿¡¼­ °èÃøÇ×
¸ñµéÀ» ºñ±³, ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ¾È¸é°ñ°Ý ÇüÅ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °èÃøÇ׸ñµé Áß ANB, AFDI, Facial angle, Wits appraisal, ODI,
S-Go, IMPA°¡ Á¤»ó±³ÇÕÀÚ¿Í ¥²±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÚ »çÀÌ¿¡ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
2. ¼³ÇèÀº ¥²±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÚ°¡ Á¤»ó±³ÇÕÀÚ¿¡ ºñÇØ ÇÏÈĹ濡 À§Ä¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¼³¹èÀÇ ¼öÁ÷Àû
À§Ä¡´Â ¥²±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ¿¡¼­ ´õ ÇϹ濡 À§Ä¡ÇÏ¿´°í, ÇôÀÇ ±æÀÌ´Â Á¤»ó±³ÇÕÀÚ¿¡ ºñÇØ ¥²±Þ ºÎ
Á¤±³ÇÕ¿¡¼­ ´õ ª¾Ò´Ù.
3. ¼³°ñÀÇ ¼öÆòÀû, ¼öÁ÷Àû À§Ä¡´Â Á¤»ó±³ÇÕÀÚ¿Í ¥²±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÚ »çÀÌ¿¡ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
4. Á¤»ó±³ÇÕÀÚ¿Í ¥²±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÚ µÎ ±º ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ¼³ÇèÀÇ ¼öÆòÀû, ¼öÁ÷Àû À§Ä¡¿Í ¾È¸é°ñ°Ý
°èÃøÄ¡µé »çÀÌ¿¡ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
This study was to investigate the posture of the tongue and hyoid bone in subjects
with normal occlusion and Class ¥² malocclusion.
Thirty eight subjects who had no systemic disease, orthodontic and prosthodontic
treatment-20 of normal occlusion, 18 of Class ¥² malocclusion-were selected. The
posture of the tongue and hyoid bone was measured by lateral cephalogram taken at
rest position. Also lateral cephalogram was taken from the same subjects at centric
occlusion for craniotacial variables and the posture of the tongue and hyoid bone was
compared with craniofacial variables in each group.
The results were as follows ;
1. There were significant difference in ANB, APDI, Facial angle, Wits appraisal, ODI,
Posterior facial height(S-Go) and IMPA among the craniofacial variables between Class
¥² and normal group.
2. Tongue tip in subjects with Class ¥² malocclusion was located at lower and
posterior position than that with normal occlusion and the tongue dorsum in subjects
with Class ¥² malocclusion was located at lower position than that with normal
occlusion. Also, tongue length with Class ¥² malocclusion was shorter than that with
normal occlusion.
3. There was no significant difference for the posture of the hyoid bone between the
Class ¥² and normal groups.
4. The postures of the tongue and hyoid bone were assoicated with vertical
components more than horizontal components of the craniofacial variables.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI